No charges have been bought against the Bhatty brother's for perverting the course of justice. How many times are they going to get away? When they have openly admitted lying in court on the dock, the Judge still allowed them to be used as witnesses. In a Murder trial when a witness is not just found but admitting they lied and were proven liars. The only reason the CPS got six convictions was purely sympathy from the biased Jury members for the family of the deceased. The main culprits the Police investigators, CPS and of course the courts. This is not the end the Police investigators will have to explain their conduct and method of investigation when they did not follow investigation rules "The code of practice pursuant to the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 requires: In conducting an investigation the investigator should pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry, whether these point towards or away from the suspect. What is reasonable in each case will depend upon the particular circumstances". Innocent people locked up families destroyed because scum bhatty and co wanted to exact revenge for previous altercations hope they rot in hell.
Four walk free as Judge halts Trial for Murder of Brothers.
Four youths have walked free after one of the longest-running murder cases in Old Bailey history was dramatically halted by the judge.
Judge Christopher Moss stepped in amid allegations that key prosecution witnesses had changed their evidence.
As a result police have launched an investigation into a possible attempt to pervert the course of justice.
A bid by Crown lawyers to have the judge's decision reversed was rejected in the Court of Appeal.
Lord Justice Latham, sitting with Mr Justice Royce and Sir Peter Cresswell, backed the trial judge and ordered that not guilty verdicts be entered for the defendants.
The four had been accused of stabbing to death brothers Mohammed and Hayder Ali in an ambush in Tooting in April 2006.
They were attacked by up to 30 youths acting "like a pack of wolves" and armed with bats, screwdrivers, knives and poles.
In a seven-and-a-half-month trial last year six men were convicted of murder, but the second trial was stopped after four months.
Quadeer Khan, 23, of Wandsworth; Bilal Kayani, 20, and Shahzad Kayani, 19, both of Tooting; and Omar Butt, 32, of Fulham, had denied murder and violent disorder.
The decision will come as a blow to Sadia Ali, the widow of Mohammed Ali, who was six months pregnant with their second child when he was killed. The couple married when they were 18.
"Mohammed was so hardworking, he would do anything for me, his mother and sisters," she said.
"When he was killed I was 23 and a widow. We were so young to get married, but we were in love and he always looked after me."
The court heard that the murders were "the terrible endgame" to an ongoing feud between Muslim gangs in south-west London.
Mohammed Ali, 24, an IT sales manager of Battersea, was cut down as he tried to flee the gang.
When his brother tried to help he was stabbed four times in the back and collapseda few feet away. Hayder, 23 a recruitment consultant from Southfields, was engaged and due to marry in November last year.
Police searches recovered 39 different weapons including two knives, four bats, three screwdrivers, a hammer, knuckle dusters, metal poles, scissors, a broken bottle and even a menu board from an Indian restaurant.
But in legal submissions Kayani's counsel Jonathan Whitfield and Liam Walker argued that key witnesses had changed their evidence after being contacted during the trial.
After mobile phone records were disclosed the judge ruled that it was impossible for the defendants to receive a fair trial.
Judge Moss said: "I conclude there is an inference to be drawn that the additions and change to the evidence were occasioned by telephone traffic."
He added: "There has been contact for improper purposes between the relevant parties in this sorry tale... The probity of these proceedings had been affected in such a way it can never been cured."
Imran Ali, 20, of Mitcham; Noor Kayani, 22, from Tooting; Imran Hussain, 23, of Tooting; Aazam Butt, 20, of Fulham; and Hassan Mir, 18, and Usman Butt, 19 of no fixed address, were convicted of the murder at the earlier trial and will be sentenced later.
I don't think I have anymore to say, I have been writing all this and now it has been proved but I wonder what will happen to the people convicted. There are innocent people still locked up, the Wimbledon Gang have gone out of their way to stitch everyone up.
So how many more innocent people are locked up in Prison when they were convicted on the words of the Bhatties the lying scum.
Imran Hussain was found GUILTY only on the word of Javaad Bhatty who is now being investigated for perverting the course of justice.
The second Trial is underway and finally the lie’s are once again coming out Hammad has once again changed his story not remembering what he said in the first Trial.
Sheila Nazir also forgot what she said and changed her story.
Anyone telling the truth does not forget what they had said even 10 years down the line, because a person who is telling the truth never forgets knowing what he saw or heard and goes by that.
They all sat together and plotted what to say, and what story or who they should blame, now find themselves automatically lying.
Last week Jawaad Bhatty who in the first Trial said he saw Imran Hussain stab Hayder Ali in the back has suddenly changed his statement again, now saying Umar Butt who is now standing Trial was also there attacking Hayder. He never mentioned this in any of his previous statements the Bhatt’s have changed their statement’s a record 13 times, but the Judge surprisingly supported Jawaad saying it’s not his fault he felt scared naming Umar Butt because his friend was attacked by Umer 11 years ago.
I can clearly see what they are doing they are not satisfied 6 people have gone down now they are doing their best to try and send down the other 4 in the second trial.
This is all being planned by Shahid Ali who is directing the Bhatty’s as what to say and what blame to put on what person. This is one of the most unfair Trial’s I have witnessed ever the Judge is clearly biased; the Prosecution just want convictions regardless if the people are innocent.
Is this the kind of legal system we want, where the Judge is continuously allowing witnesses to change their statements as they wish, Where the Police have never arrested the Wimbledon Gang when they were clearly the aggressors, they should have been arrested and charged for Joint Enterprise to commit Grievous Bodily Harm with Intent (Section 18).
But instead the Police used them as their main witnesses and thus allowing them to exact revenge for old rivalry on the Tooting lads with help from the Police.
A double murder trial took place at the Old Bailey starting in January 2007 the case was of a double murder against a group of boys who were arrested and charged. The case which I started attending regularly was R-V- Mir and others.
The Prosecution case: - On the night of 21st-22nd April 2006 two men were murdered by a gang from Tooting when the Wimbledon Gang were ambushed and attacked and stabbed to death. It was also stated the two brother’s had gone along with 11 other known gang member’s to sort out a feud which had been brewing. Well this all started when Hassan Mir allegedly slapped Hammad Bhatty in the face and Hammad returning with his crew.
Then on the fateful night of 21st April a van loaded with weapons and boy’s entered Tooting looking for someone to either kill or seriously harm. In the van were Mohammad and Hayder Ali (deceased) Hammad, Javaad, Fawaad Bhatty, Yaseen Bashir, Zachary Sharp, Ashfaq Razaq, David Sackey, Erkan Volcan and Sharjeel Chaudhry. They had a variety of weapons ranging from Knives, steel poles, hammers, machete, bricks, bottles, wheel jack, baseball bats, scissors even a Stanley knife and numerous other weapons. They drove around Tooting from 10.00pm to 12.10am looking for someone to seriously harm or kill. The friend’s from Tooting did not want a fight but were being confronted with a gang of thugs who were intent on harm.
On numerous occasions cars with family of the Wimbledon Gang were driving up and down Tooting High Street and passing on information to the boy’s in the van as to the location of the friend’s from Tooting. Three cars which were seen were Tariq Begs black Mercedes benz C-class a Silver Volkswagen Polo Y registration, and Hammad Bhattys sisters black Volkswagen people carrier.
On numerous occasions the Bhatty sisters were driving past the friend’s from Tooting and shouting obscenity or using their hands to show obscenity also passing on information to their brother’s.
Another car seen was a Silver Volkswagen Polo with four female occupants with headscarves driving up and down but were spotted parked in Fircroft Road prior to the incident facing towards the main road when spotted they reversed all the way back up Fircroft Road and disappeared.
Then the van appeared for a final time first stopping on the corner of Noyna Road and all occupant’s jumping out of the van and one independent witness verified seeing a knife in one of the boy’s hands. Then they all returned inside the van and drove up Noyna Road taking a left at the end then taking their first left and appearing on Fircroft Road. When reaching the end of Fircroft Road they stopped even though their way was opened to take a left or a right turn but chose to say idle.
This is when they started to jump out from the sides and back of the van armed, and were then ensued in a fight which started. Once the fight was over the Police recovered numerous weapons which included the fingerprints of the Wimbledon Gang including the Ali brother’s.
The trial went on for quite a while but the Jury decided to ignore all the facts and go solely on emotion. When we choose a Jury we do so in the fact that they would listen to all the evidence and witness statement’s and then decide a verdict not on emotion but on merit and a principle of the Law. I have not gone in to the first Trial or second Trial which is taking place at this time for a reason, I will slowly start putting up all the evidence Prosecution or defence have put forward which I promise defence evidence outweighs the Prosecution evidence.
Down below I will paste a copy of what I have written before:-
BUTCHERED IN TOOTING.
This was the claim that was made by the media, police, and the ignorant people in the society we live in; well the truth is far from it. I was an independent attendee of the court trial for 8 months; I will highlight all the true facts that are involved in this case.
It was claimed that these brothers may god rest their soul in peace, were sitting in a van, dragged out and beaten to death.
Well the facts are these two brothers along with 11 known Wimbledon gang members sent by the godfather Tahir Hussain (who works as a youth worker in his Wimbledon club on Haydon’s road) to kill Hassan Mir and his friends. Tahir Hussein (Wimbledon Gang leader) at this time on trial for a 20 million pound cheque fraud. Raheel Butt (Tahir’s sidekick)
Imran Hussein (the Bengali tiger convictions for fraud and G.B.H and assault)Rizwan Hussein (convictions for V.A.T fraud) Tariq Beg (Fraud)But unfortunately the tables turned and instead the two brothers died.
The Wimbledon gang openly admitted in court they came with swords, knives, bats, hammers and metal bars, machete, knuckle duster.The white van had been driving around since 10pm looking for Hassan and his friends. When they found them, they smashed Hassan’s friend’s car and chased them around Tooting like a pack of wolves. Hassan’s friends scared for their lives ran and hid in neighbouring gardens. Police were called but they did not arrive until it was too late and both brothers died two hours later, as a result of the Hassan’s friends acting in self defence.
Had the police reacted to this distress call the outcome would have been very different. Police in a desperate attempt to conceal the truth and with added pressure from the media and members of the public acted bias in this investigation. In a frantic attempt to rectify their mistake they quickly arrested a random group of Asian youths in and around Tooting (labelling them as gang members), listening to hear say and tarnished information. Several witnesses came on the dock to testify how the gang in the white van had behaved; using both physical and verbal abuse they had chased Hassan and his friends with an intention to do harm. Jawaad Bhatty, Hamaad Bhatty, Favaad Bhatty and Yaseen Basheer came to the dock despite their friends being killed and deceived the entire courtroom with a fabricated concept of that night ,so much so that the defence barristers caught them out on countless occasions during the trial. The Wimbledon gang admitted in court they came with weapons to kill Hassan and his friends. The Bhatty brothers changed their statements so often while under oath in the dock their statements were branded as unreliable by the Judge. So where did the jury get their verdict?
There was one person in the dock called Imran Hussein (known as switch) after listening to all the evidence against him it was concluded that he was not present at the scene, but he was still convicted with this appalling verdict.
After this long tedious trial, everyone knew the truth of this matter was self defence, and the Wimbledon gang provoked Hassan and his friends, ending in their tragic accidental death. Despite all the evidence in favour of Hassan and his fellow friends standing trial the verdict delivered was shocking and undeserved, ultimately deciding the future for these impressionable, naive young men who became victims of circumstances through trying to defend themselves and their property and all of this coming from the jury that unbelievably had one member who was always asleep and another who in total had taken 40 days off. One would think that the jury would be capable of demonstrating democracy, everyone treated fairly upon evidence .How can we put trust in the English system?.I am a law student in my final year, and from what I saw and heard there was absolutely no evidence to convict these friends for the verdict the jury came with, the honourable Judge himself summarized to the Jury that this was provoked retaliation. In my opinion these young men are being made an example of due to growing concerns for gang violence resulting in high numbers of teen deaths .The Judge unfortunately bared the heavy burden of conveying this unforeseen, harsh and unjust message of a zero tolerance verdict. I spoke to one of the defendant’s barrister’s after he had come out of the trial, and an appeal will be put in, to get all of these very foolish but undoubtedly innocent boys out of prison.
Did the jury act on emotions?
Was there police in the jury?
Was the jury coached?
Miscarriage of justice?Indeed it was.
No comments:
Post a Comment